Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05359
Original file (BC 2013 05359.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF: 	DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05359

					COUNSEL:  NONE

		HEARING DESIRED:  NO 



APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His records be corrected to reflect his date of birth (DOB) as 
19 Jul 60 rather than 18 Jul 60.


APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

His DOB on his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge 
from Active Duty, is incorrect.

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A.


STATEMENT OF FACTS:

On 16 Jul 84, the applicant commenced his service with the Regular 
Air Force and served on active duty until 3 Jun 88, when he was 
honorably discharged.

The applicant’s enlistment documents (DD Form 4, Enlistment/ 
Reenlistment Document, and AF Form 3007, Enlisted Agreement (Non-
Prior Service) United States Air Force), and his DD Form 214, 
Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, dated 3 Jun 
88, reflect his DOB as 18 Jul 60.

Under the provisions of AFI 36-2608, Military Personnel Records 
Systems, the DOB of a former service member will not be corrected 
unless there is evidence showing the DOB was erroneously recorded 
while serving in the Air Force.  


AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSIRP recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of 
an error or an injustice noting a review of the applicant’s 
military personnel records revealed he enlisted, served, and was 
discharged under the DOB 18 Jul 60.  There is no evidence the 
applicant’s DOB was erroneously recorded or that a DOB change was 
requested while on active duty.  Therefore, since the applicant 
has no continuing affiliation with the Air Force as a Reserve 
member or retiree, his military record cannot be amended after the 
fact.

A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIRP evaluation is at Exhibit C.


APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant 
on 2 Jun 14 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D).  As 
of this date, no response has been received by this office.


THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing 
law or regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice.  We took 
notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the 
merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and 
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility 
(OPR) and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the 
applicant has not been the victim of an error of injustice.  
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no 
basis to recommend granting the requested relief.


FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS OF THE BOARD:

After careful consideration of applicant’s request and the 
available evidence of record, we find the application untimely.  
Applicant did not file within three years after the alleged error 
or injustice was discovered as required by Title 10, United States 
Code, Section 1552 and Air Force Instruction    36-2603.  
Applicant has not shown a plausible reason for the delay in 
filing, and we are not persuaded that the record raises issues of 
error or injustice which require resolution on the merits.  Thus, 
we cannot conclude it would be in the interest of justice to 
excuse the applicant’s failure to file in a timely manner.




The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number 
BC-2013-05359 in Executive Session on 23 Oct 14, under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603:

	 , Panel Chair
	 , Member
	 , Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

	Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 12 Nov 13, w/atchs.
	Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
	Exhibit C.  Memorandum, AFPC/DPSIRP, dated 6 Feb 14.
Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 2 Jun 14.




3
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY – PRIVACY ACT OF 1974

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY – PRIVACY ACT OF 1974
1

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00945

    Original file (BC 2013 00945.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    In support of his request, the applicant provides copies of his birth certificate, WD AGO Form 53-55, Enlisted Record and Report of Separation Honorable Discharge; WD-AGO Form 100, Army of the United States Separation Qualification Record, a witness statement from a lieutenant stating that he was stationed in Tinian, Island, Japan with the applicant and various other documents associated with his request. A review of the applicant’s master personnel records and documentation submitted...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00875

    Original file (BC 2014 00875.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIRP recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. While we note the comments of the Air Force office of primary responsibility indicating that there was no evidence presented that the applicant’s date of birth was erroneously recorded, based...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00242

    Original file (BC 2014 00242.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIRP recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. Air Force Instruction (AFI) 36-2608, Military Personnel Record System, Tab A7.5, Correction of DOB, Note 3 reads “Do not correct records of former members unless evidence proves the date of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01022

    Original file (BC 2014 01022.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIRP recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. The absence of any original or a certified copy of the legal supporting documentation is not sufficient to evaluate whether the date was recorded in error. Exhibit C. Memorandum, AFPC/DPSIRP,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02974

    Original file (BC 2014 02974.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02974 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His WD AGO Form 53, Enlistment Record and Report of Separation, be changed to reflect his Date of Birth (DOB) as 12 Aug 25, instead of 12 Aug 24. Air Force Instruction 36-2608, Military Personnel Records System, Table A7.5, Note 3 states “Do not...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03197

    Original file (BC 2013 03197.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-03197 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge be upgraded to general. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01357

    Original file (BC 2014 01357.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Air Force Instruction 36-2608, Military Personnel Records System, Table A7.5, Correction of Date of Birth, Note 3 states, "Do not correct records of former members unless evidence proves the date of birth used while serving with the Air Force was erroneously recorded". Air Force Instruction 36-2608, Military Personnel Records System, Table A7.1, Note 1 states, "Do not correct records of former members unless evidence proves the SSN used while serving with the Air Force was erroneously...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00372

    Original file (BC-2012-00372.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DPSIRP states that Air Force Instruction 36-2608, Table A7, requires the source document for the requested change to be either the original or, a certified or notarized copy of the original. On 5 April 2012, their office notified the applicant of the documentation requirement; however, to date the applicant has not furnished the original or notarized copy of his birth certificate. We note the applicant was notified by letter from AFPC/DPSIRP that in order to verify his true DOB, they...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05257

    Original file (BC 2013 05257.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05257 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal (RVCM). There is no official documentation in the applicant’s official military record verifying he was in the area of eligibility for an aggregate of six months in support of the Vietnam Armed Forces. While the applicant contends that the fact that he was...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05709

    Original file (BC 2013 05709.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The DD Form 4 does not reflect his SSN, only his service number. The DD Form 214 reflects his SSN as XXX-XX-XXXX. The complete DPSIRP evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant provided a printout from the Social Security Administration that reflects his SSN as “XXX-XX-XXXX” (Exhibit E).